NADINE TUNLEY
The recent welcome announcement by the Government that the Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE) cap for 2022-2023 would increase to 19,000 came after weeks of discussions, where it became obvious that there are differing needs for horticulture.
Within the sector we know this but the Government, at a number of levels, does not understand. Yes, I hear you say, “well they should” and I used to think that as well. However, I have learnt that with finite resources and more often than not, tight to unrealistic time frames, we need to choose our battles.
The Government expects the horticulture sector to come to it with one point of view. It does not have the time or inclination to deal with us all separately. This situation means that between us, we often need to quickly come to a shared position and communicate that succinctly and clearly to the Government, as the final decision maker.
Early next year, a substantive review of the RSE scheme will get underway. In this review, it will be imperative that we come together as effectively and efficiently as possible to articulate growers’ views and be united. If we can’t do this, we risk losing our seat at the table.
I often hear growers say that HortNZ should ‘just walk away’ from the Government’s negotiation table. To me, that is not an option. We must maintain our position so as to be able to put forward our view. Note I said view and not views.
The reality is you all have different views because you are looking at things from your part of the sector’s perspective. That is what we, as your representatives, would expect. However, my team’s and my role is to collate and distil all these different views, and present the best collective position.
HortNZ can only do this if we are trusted and have a thorough understanding of the dynamics and challenges of commercial fruit and vegetable growing in New Zealand. To be confident in our views, we need growers to talk to us, their product groups and district associations, who then need to work with us to form a collective response.
This will definitely need to happen in the review of the RSE scheme next year. The Government is counting on there being one team at the negotiating table (which includes viticulture for this topic).
If we don’t come together as one team, we will be unable to ensure that the RSE scheme continues to enjoy the success that it has over the past 15 years.
The other point I would like to make is being able to come to a collective view quickly is the best use of grower levy money. They say that talk is cheap but I can assure you it is not. Talk costs and it could cost our industry dearly, in the context of future central Government policy decisions.
That’s been the reality of the RSE cap increase decision. Leave millions of dollars of fruit on the trees and vegetables in the field, and reduce the value of the New Zealand brand in overseas markets through quality issues – or find a compromise position: one that our entire industry can make work.
